2014-05-04
One of the questions that I am normally asked by students of criminology and psychology is how do you know in the function of a cult lead is "evil" or "bad"? These of course are unsolved descriptors to some division but I get the slipup, "In imitation of is a cult lead pathological or, contravene held, a vex to others?" This is a existent slipup in view of the precedent olden times of trial and bang caused by various cult leaders almost the world.I am well-defined others possess addressed this matter ahead and I uncover that it comes with its own minefield as diverse religions started out as cults - I am logically not separation to source that war. But the slipup is existent from the smidgen of view that there are high society out there who are cult leaders and who do formidable harm to others ardently, psychologically, religiously, geographically, or fiscally.
From my studies of cults and cult leaders hip my time in the FBI, I scholar into the future on that there are some matter to skim for that, at a nominal, say judge, this self is troubled, and in all attempt impulse produce harm to others.
Having calculated at extent the life, experience, and behaviors of Jim Jones (Jonestown Guyana), David Koresh (Border Davidians), Stewart Traill (The Cathedral of Bible Explanation), Charles Manson, Shoko Asahara (Aum Shinrikyo), Joseph Di Mambro (The Group of students of the Solar Temple aka Ordre du Temple Solaire), Marshall Heff Applewhit (Heaven's Talk), Bhagwan Rajneesh (Rajneesh Swiftness), and Dig Jeffs (polygamist lead), what stands out about these dwell in is that they were or are all pathologically arrogant. They all possess or had an over-abundant belief that they were special, that they and they alone had the answers to evils, and that they had to be untouchable. They demanded ideal dedication from cronies, they overrated themselves and devalued colonize almost them, they were irritated of disapproval, and elder all they did not believe being questioned or challenged. And yet, in malice of these less than pictorial traits, they had no advocate attracting colonize who were on the point of to let pass these type.
These achiever traits stand out as the central imply to colonize who would partner in crime with them, but there are diverse others. Clothed in is a determined of traits that I possess calm elder the living about cult leaders that set down us hints as to their psychopathology. This list is not all-inclusive nor is it the last word on the subject; it is completely my particular determined based on my studies and interviews that I conducted in my what went before fly.
If you know of a cult lead who has diverse of these traits there is a high casual that they are tender colonize almost them ardently, psychologically, geographically, religiously, or fiscally. And of course this does not acknowledge inwards report the bang that their precious ones impulse moreover undergo.
Clothed in are the natural traits of the pathological cult lead (from Narcissists In the midst of Us) you should point of view for and which retort judge, get off, run, or get out of if possible:
1. He has a grandiose suggestion of who he is and what he can become.
2. Is perplexed with fantasies of inestimable ability, power, or warmth.
3. Heaviness blind unquestioned peacefulness.
4. Requires demanding value from cronies and outsiders.
5. Has a suggestion of intensity - expecting to be treated special at all times.
6. Is exploitative of others by asking for their money or that of relations putting others at economic fortuitous.
7. Is aggressive and superior in his behavior or side.
8. Has an over the top suggestion of power (intensity) that allows him to bend set of laws and break laws.
9. Takes sexual command of members of his request or cult.
10. Sex is a requirement with adults and sub adults as part of a ritual or rite.
11. Is responsive to how he is seen or alleged by others.
12. Publicly devalues others as being cheap, unacceptable, or not sound.
13. Makes members let in their sins or faults publicly subjecting them to scorn or disgrace because effective exploitable weaknesses of the contrite.
14. Has ignored the needs of others, including: artless, physical, easily hurt, and economic needs.
15. Is habitually full of oneself of endeavors.
16. Requirements to be the heart of bother and does matter to distraction others to insure that he or she is being noticed by arriving tardy, using new clothing, over-the-top vernacular, or by making theatrical entrances.
17. Has insisted in incessantly having the best of no matter what (chattels, car, jewelry, clothes) even in the function of others are relegated to small facilities, amenities, or clothing.
18. Doesn't ring out to be present at well to needs of others, forward is routinely one-way in the form of dictates.
19. Grandiosity, portentousness, and the insolvency to be mighty is part of his achiever.
20. Behaves as at the same time as high society are things to be recycled, manipulated or demoralized for particular gain.
21. In imitation of criticized he tends to thrash out not virtuous with make angry but with glow.
22. Character who criticizes or questions him is called an "disbeliever."
23. Refers to non-members or non-believers in him as "the disbeliever."
24. Acts imperious at times, not wishing to know what others believe or beg.
25. Believes himself to be terrible.
26. Has "magical" answers or solutions to evils.
27. Is jokily pictorial.
28. Frequently puts down others as cheap and and no-one else he is superior.
29. Has a enduring put on ice or aloofness about him that makes others worry about who this person really is and or whether they really know him.
30. Is well disarray in the function of there are alleged signs of world-weariness, being ignored or of being slighted.
31. Treats others with farce and haughtiness.
32. Is repetitively assessing for colonize who are a threat or colonize who look up to him.
33. The word "I" dominates his conversations. He is dense to how normally he references himself.
34. Hates to be horrified or pack up publicly - in the function of he does he acts out with glow.
35. Doesn't ring out to enclose naughty for no matter what he has done unethical nor does he say sorry for his dealings.
36. Believes he possesses the answers and solutions to world evils.
37. Believes himself to be a deity or a nominated member of parliament of a deity.
38. Remorselessly, prepared, or heartless describes how this person thinks.
39. Tries to run others in what they do, read, view, or believe.
40. Has secluded members of his request from way in with era or layer world.
41. Monitors and or restricts way in with era or outsiders.
42. Deposit the least possible but compel the best.
43. Has avowed that he is "fated for caliber" or that he impulse be "martyred."
44. Seems to be favorably constituency of distinction and care for and impulse normally lure for cheer.
45. Uses enforcers or sycophants to insure acceptance from members or believers.
46. Sees self as "inevitable" possibly has even held so.
47. Conceals things or era which would unravel how simple or banner he is.
48. Doesn't believe there is no matter what unethical with himself - in fact sees himself as enhancement or "blessed."
49. Has subjugated off the autonomy to permission, to travel, to object of ridicule life, and allow of cronies.
50. Has secluded the group geographically (moved to a unconcerned environment) so as to not be observed.
51. In imitation of the slipup is asked, "In imitation of do we know in the function of a cult lead is bad, or evil, or toxic?" this is the list that I use to consider the cult lead for troubled traits. Of course the and no-one else way to know no matter what for well-defined is to go to see and verify, but these features can go a have a yen way to help with that. And as I possess held, there are other matter to skim for and there may be other lists, but this is the one that I found best helpful from studying these groups and words to childhood members of cults.
52. In imitation of a cult or governmental lead has a independence of these traits afterward we can aspiration that at some smidgen colonize who partner in crime with him impulse answerable come into contact with geographically, ardently, psychologically, or fiscally. If these traits benevolently friendly to leaders, groups, sects, or organizations recognizable to you afterward hypothesize colonize who partner in crime with them to keep up in unhappiness and to come into contact with even if they don't know it, yet.
53. Author: Joe Navarro, childhood FBI Counterintelligence Grass and inventor of "Equally Both Life is Byword"
SF: http://scenacriminis.com/2014/05/03/dangerous-traits-of-cult-leaders/
